4th Drink Driving Charge – No Jail – Ringwood Magistrates’ Court
The Court: Ringwood Magistrates’ Court
The Date: April 2025
- 49(1)(b) of the Road Safety Act 1986 – driving a motor vehicle while more than the prescribed concentration of alcohol is present in breath (Alleged reading 0.202)
- 49(1)(f) of the Road Safety Act 1986 – Within 3 hours after driving a motor vehicle, furnish a sample of breath and the indicated concentration of alcohol after driving or being in charge of a motor vehicle (alleged reading 0.202)
- 49(1)(a) of the Road Safety Act 1986 – driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor to such an extent as to be incapable of having proper control of the vehicle
- Under section 49(1)(b) of the Road Safety Act 1986, a person if found guilty of a second offence, is liable for a fine up to $23,710.80 or imprisonment for 12 months.
- Under section 49(1)(f) of the Road Safety Act 1986, a person if found guilty of a third offence, is liable for a fine up to $35,566.20 or imprisonment for 18 months.
- Under section 49(1)(a) of the Road Safety Act 1986, a person, if found guilty, is liable for a fine up to $4,939.75 or imprisonment for 3 months.
Our client was intercepted by police who were working at a Preliminary Breath Testing site. Our client did a roadside preliminary breath test which indicated that alcohol was present in his breath.
Our client accompanied police to the Testing Vehicle where they conducted an evidentiary breath test revealing that our client had a breath alcohol concentration of 0.202 (four times the legal limit). Our client’s licence was immediately suspended for a period of 12 months. Our client had three previous drink drive cases.
As our client had previous drink driving oPences, their licence was cancelled for 40 months and was given a 9-month Community Corrections Order (CCO). Our client was pleased with the outcome as they did not have to pay any fines and was not sentenced to a term of imprisonment.
Other Case Studies
-
WADL Case Summary – Careless Driving and Failure to Exchange DetailsThe Court: Ringwood Magistrates’ Court The Date: January 2026 The Charges: Road Safety Act 61 (1) (c) – Where owing to the presence of such motor vehicle where property was damaged, did fail at the scene to exchange details including name and address. Road Safety Act 7 (1) (a) – Drive a motor vehicle whilst […]
Read more -
WADL Case Study – Careless DrivingThe Court: Ringwood Magistrates Court The Date: December 2025 The Charges: Road Safety Act 65 – Drive a motor vehicle on a highway carelessly Possible penalties our client was facing: A fine of up to $2442.12 Indefinite licence loss at Magistrates’ discretion The Facts of the case: Our client was a high school student who […]
Read more -
WADL Case Summary – Driving While SuspendedThe Court: Melbourne Magistrates’ Court The Date: January 2026 The Charges: Road Safety Act 30 (1) – Driving whilst Suspended Possible penalties our client was facing: Charge 1: Licence loss at the Magistrates’ discretion Imprisonment up to 2 years A fine of up to $48,840.00 Summary of Facts for this case: Our client was driving […]
Read more -
WADL Case Summary – Driving While SuspendedThe Court: Melbourne Magistrates’ Court The Date: January 2026 The Charges: Road Safety Act 30 (1) – Drive Suspended Road Safety Act 18AA – Driver of a motor vehicle on a highway was in breach of a condition of such driver’s licence in that they did not wear corrective lenses Possible penalties our client was […]
Read more -
WADL Case Summary – Driving While DisqualifiedThe Court: Ringwood Magistrates’ Court The Date: January 2026 The Charges: Road Safety Act 30 (1) – Driving during a period of disqualification Possible penalties our client was facing: Charge 1: Imprisonment of up to 2 years Fine of up to $48.842.40 Facts of the Case: Our client was driving along a main road in […]
Read more
